Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Structure?

Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices.  how to protect yourself from emf  for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can result in many possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
how to reduce emf  for Maximum Exposure

In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.


This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In  how to reduce emf  of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.